John Deere 1600 Turbo vs Scotts L17.542
Side-by-side specs comparison
Verdict by the numbers
- The John Deere 1600 Turbo is more powerful than the Scotts L17.542: 64 HP versus 17 HP (+47 HP, +276%).
- The John Deere 1600 Turbo is heavier: 1791 kg versus 209 kg for the Scotts L17.542.
Full specs comparison
| John Deere 1600 Turbo | Scotts L17.542 | |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 64 HP | 17 HP |
| Production years | 2002–2006 | 2002 |
| Fuel | Diesel | Electric |
| Cylinders | 4 | 1 |
| Weight | 1 791 kg | 209 kg |
| Drive | 4WD | 2WD |
| Transmission | Hydrostatic | Hydrostatic |
| Wheelbase | 152 cm | — |
| Length | 335 cm | 152 cm |
| Mower deck | 42" | 42" |
Frequently asked questions
Which is more powerful, the John Deere 1600 Turbo or the Scotts L17.542?
The John Deere 1600 Turbo is more powerful than the Scotts L17.542: 64 HP versus 17 HP (+47 HP, +276%).
Which is heavier, the John Deere 1600 Turbo or the Scotts L17.542?
The John Deere 1600 Turbo is heavier: 1791 kg versus 209 kg for the Scotts L17.542.