CaseIH 1594 vs McCormick Intl X50.40m
Side-by-side specs comparison
Verdict by the numbers
- The CaseIH 1594 and the McCormick Intl X50.40m deliver the same power: 97 HP.
- The McCormick Intl X50.40m is the more recent model: production started in 2014, versus 1985 for the CaseIH 1594.
- The CaseIH 1594 offers a higher rear lift capacity: 3374 kg versus 2585 kg.
Full specs comparison
| CaseIH 1594 | McCormick Intl X50.40m | |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 97 HP | 97 HP |
| Production years | 1985–1988 | 2014–2024 |
| Fuel | Diesel | Diesel |
| Cylinders | 6 | 4 |
| Displacement | 5.4 L | 3.4 L |
| Weight | — | 3 442 kg |
| Drive | 2WD or 4WD | 2WD or 4WD |
| Transmission | Synchronized | Shuttle |
| Gears (fwd/rev) | 12 / 4 | 24 / 12 |
| Rear lift capacity | 3 374 kg | 2 585 kg |
| Wheelbase | 254 cm | 233 cm |
| Length | 416 cm | 413 cm |
| Cab | Yes | — |
Frequently asked questions
Which is more powerful, the CaseIH 1594 or the McCormick Intl X50.40m?
The CaseIH 1594 and the McCormick Intl X50.40m deliver the same power: 97 HP.
Which is more recent, the CaseIH 1594 or the McCormick Intl X50.40m?
The McCormick Intl X50.40m is the more recent model: production started in 2014, versus 1985 for the CaseIH 1594.
Which has the higher lift capacity, the CaseIH 1594 or the McCormick Intl X50.40m?
The CaseIH 1594 offers a higher rear lift capacity: 3374 kg versus 2585 kg.