CaseIH 1694 vs McCormick Intl X60.50
Side-by-side specs comparison
Verdict by the numbers
- The CaseIH 1694 and the McCormick Intl X60.50 deliver the same power: 112 HP.
- The McCormick Intl X60.50 is the more recent model: production started in 2011, versus 1985 for the CaseIH 1694.
- The McCormick Intl X60.50 offers a higher rear lift capacity: 4998 kg versus 3374 kg.
Full specs comparison
| CaseIH 1694 | McCormick Intl X60.50 | |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 112 HP | 112 HP |
| Production years | 1985–1988 | 2011–2014 |
| Fuel | Diesel | Diesel |
| Cylinders | 6 | 4 |
| Displacement | 5.4 L | 4.4 L |
| Weight | — | 4 199 kg |
| Drive | 4WD | 4WD |
| Transmission | Partial power shift | — |
| Gears (fwd/rev) | 12 / 4 | 36 / 12 |
| Rear lift capacity | 3 374 kg | 4 998 kg |
| Wheelbase | 254 cm | 245 cm |
| Length | — | 439 cm |
| Cab | — | Yes |
Frequently asked questions
Which is more powerful, the CaseIH 1694 or the McCormick Intl X60.50?
The CaseIH 1694 and the McCormick Intl X60.50 deliver the same power: 112 HP.
Which is more recent, the CaseIH 1694 or the McCormick Intl X60.50?
The McCormick Intl X60.50 is the more recent model: production started in 2011, versus 1985 for the CaseIH 1694.
Which has the higher lift capacity, the CaseIH 1694 or the McCormick Intl X60.50?
The McCormick Intl X60.50 offers a higher rear lift capacity: 4998 kg versus 3374 kg.