CaseIH 4494 vs McCormick Intl X70.80
Side-by-side specs comparison
Verdict by the numbers
- The McCormick Intl X70.80 is more powerful than the CaseIH 4494: 214 HP versus 213 HP (+1 HP, +0%).
- The McCormick Intl X70.80 is the more recent model: production started in 2012, versus 1984 for the CaseIH 4494.
- The CaseIH 4494 is heavier: 9453 kg versus 7702 kg for the McCormick Intl X70.80.
- The McCormick Intl X70.80 offers a higher rear lift capacity: 10949 kg versus 5783 kg.
Full specs comparison
| CaseIH 4494 | McCormick Intl X70.80 | |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 213 HP | 214 HP |
| Production years | 1984–1987 | 2012–2022 |
| Fuel | Diesel | Diesel |
| Cylinders | 6 | 6 |
| Displacement | 8.3 L | 6.7 L |
| Weight | 9 453 kg | 7 702 kg |
| Drive | 4WD | 4WD |
| Transmission | Partial power shift | Power shift |
| Gears (fwd/rev) | 12 / 4 | 32 / 24 |
| Rear lift capacity | 5 783 kg | 10 949 kg |
| Wheelbase | 259 cm | 287 cm |
| Length | 571 cm | 530 cm |
| Cab | Yes | Yes |
Frequently asked questions
Which is more powerful, the CaseIH 4494 or the McCormick Intl X70.80?
The McCormick Intl X70.80 is more powerful than the CaseIH 4494: 214 HP versus 213 HP (+1 HP, +0%).
Which is more recent, the CaseIH 4494 or the McCormick Intl X70.80?
The McCormick Intl X70.80 is the more recent model: production started in 2012, versus 1984 for the CaseIH 4494.
Which is heavier, the CaseIH 4494 or the McCormick Intl X70.80?
The CaseIH 4494 is heavier: 9453 kg versus 7702 kg for the McCormick Intl X70.80.
Which has the higher lift capacity, the CaseIH 4494 or the McCormick Intl X70.80?
The McCormick Intl X70.80 offers a higher rear lift capacity: 10949 kg versus 5783 kg.
Other comparisons
CaseIH 4494 vs Deutz-Allis DX8.30CaseIH 4494 vs International Harvester 7288CaseIH 4494 vs J.I. Case 4494CaseIH 4494 vs Versatile 836John Deere 6215R vs McCormick Intl X70.80John Deere 6R 215 vs McCormick Intl X70.80John Deere 7215R vs McCormick Intl X70.80McCormick Intl X70.80 vs Versatile 210 Nemesis