CaseIH Farmall DX22E vs McCormick Intl X10.25H
Side-by-side specs comparison
Verdict by the numbers
- The CaseIH Farmall DX22E and the McCormick Intl X10.25H deliver the same power: 22 HP.
- The McCormick Intl X10.25H is the more recent model: production started in 2011, versus 2006 for the CaseIH Farmall DX22E.
- The McCormick Intl X10.25H is heavier: 969 kg versus 596 kg for the CaseIH Farmall DX22E.
- The CaseIH Farmall DX22E offers a higher rear lift capacity: 317 kg versus 228 kg.
Full specs comparison
| CaseIH Farmall DX22E | McCormick Intl X10.25H | |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 22 HP | 22 HP |
| Production years | 2006–2007 | 2011–2014 |
| Fuel | Diesel | Diesel |
| Cylinders | 3 | 3 |
| Displacement | 1 L | 1 L |
| Weight | 596 kg | 969 kg |
| Drive | 4WD | 4WD |
| Transmission | Hydrostatic | Hydrostatic |
| Rear lift capacity | 317 kg | 228 kg |
| Wheelbase | 139 cm | 147 cm |
| Length | 244 cm | 268 cm |
Frequently asked questions
Which is more powerful, the CaseIH Farmall DX22E or the McCormick Intl X10.25H?
The CaseIH Farmall DX22E and the McCormick Intl X10.25H deliver the same power: 22 HP.
Which is more recent, the CaseIH Farmall DX22E or the McCormick Intl X10.25H?
The McCormick Intl X10.25H is the more recent model: production started in 2011, versus 2006 for the CaseIH Farmall DX22E.
Which is heavier, the CaseIH Farmall DX22E or the McCormick Intl X10.25H?
The McCormick Intl X10.25H is heavier: 969 kg versus 596 kg for the CaseIH Farmall DX22E.
Which has the higher lift capacity, the CaseIH Farmall DX22E or the McCormick Intl X10.25H?
The CaseIH Farmall DX22E offers a higher rear lift capacity: 317 kg versus 228 kg.
Other comparisons
CaseIH Farmall DX22E vs Kubota BX2230CaseIH Farmall DX22E vs Kubota KL230CaseIH Farmall DX22E vs Kubota KT230CaseIH Farmall DX22E vs New Holland TZ22DAJohn Deere 1025R vs McCormick Intl X10.25HKubota KT235 vs McCormick Intl X10.25HMahindra eMax 22 vs McCormick Intl X10.25HMahindra Max 22 vs McCormick Intl X10.25H

