CaseIH Puma 140 vs New Holland T6.175
Side-by-side specs comparison
Verdict by the numbers
- The CaseIH Puma 140 and the New Holland T6.175 deliver the same power: 140 HP.
- The New Holland T6.175 is the more recent model: production started in 2012, versus 2008 for the CaseIH Puma 140.
- The CaseIH Puma 140 is heavier: 6225 kg versus 5010 kg for the New Holland T6.175.
- The CaseIH Puma 140 offers a higher rear lift capacity: 5527 kg versus 3048 kg.
Full specs comparison
| CaseIH Puma 140 | New Holland T6.175 | |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 140 HP | 140 HP |
| Production years | 2008–2011 | 2012–2025 |
| Fuel | Diesel | Diesel |
| Cylinders | 6 | 6 |
| Displacement | 6.7 L | 6.7 L |
| Weight | 6 225 kg | 5 010 kg |
| Drive | 4WD | 4WD |
| Transmission | Partial power shift | Power shift |
| Gears (fwd/rev) | 18 / 6 | — |
| Rear lift capacity | 5 527 kg | 3 048 kg |
| Wheelbase | 273 cm | — |
| Length | — | 453 cm |
| Cab | Yes | Yes |
Frequently asked questions
Which is more powerful, the CaseIH Puma 140 or the New Holland T6.175?
The CaseIH Puma 140 and the New Holland T6.175 deliver the same power: 140 HP.
Which is more recent, the CaseIH Puma 140 or the New Holland T6.175?
The New Holland T6.175 is the more recent model: production started in 2012, versus 2008 for the CaseIH Puma 140.
Which is heavier, the CaseIH Puma 140 or the New Holland T6.175?
The CaseIH Puma 140 is heavier: 6225 kg versus 5010 kg for the New Holland T6.175.
Which has the higher lift capacity, the CaseIH Puma 140 or the New Holland T6.175?
The CaseIH Puma 140 offers a higher rear lift capacity: 5527 kg versus 3048 kg.
Other comparisons
CaseIH Puma 140 vs John Deere 6830CaseIH Puma 140 vs John Deere 6830 PremiumCaseIH Puma 140 vs John Deere 7515CaseIH Puma 140 vs Massey Ferguson 5480Kioti HX1401 vs New Holland T6.175Massey Ferguson 6615 vs New Holland T6.175Massey Ferguson 7615 vs New Holland T6.175Massey Ferguson 7715 vs New Holland T6.175