CaseIH Puma 160 vs McCormick Intl X7.460
Side-by-side specs comparison
Verdict by the numbers
- The CaseIH Puma 160 and the McCormick Intl X7.460 deliver the same power: 160 HP.
- The McCormick Intl X7.460 is the more recent model: production started in 2013, versus 2011 for the CaseIH Puma 160.
- The CaseIH Puma 160 is heavier: 7420 kg versus 5751 kg for the McCormick Intl X7.460.
- The McCormick Intl X7.460 offers a higher rear lift capacity: 9298 kg versus 3583 kg.
Full specs comparison
| CaseIH Puma 160 | McCormick Intl X7.460 | |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 160 HP | 160 HP |
| Production years | 2011–2013 | 2013–2023 |
| Fuel | Diesel | Diesel |
| Cylinders | 6 | 4 |
| Displacement | 6.7 L | 4.5 L |
| Weight | 7 420 kg | 5 751 kg |
| Drive | 4WD | 4WD |
| Transmission | Power shift | Power shift |
| Gears (fwd/rev) | 18 / 6 | — |
| Rear lift capacity | 3 583 kg | 9 298 kg |
| Wheelbase | 273 cm | 260 cm |
| Length | — | 303 cm |
| Cab | Yes | Yes |
Frequently asked questions
Which is more powerful, the CaseIH Puma 160 or the McCormick Intl X7.460?
The CaseIH Puma 160 and the McCormick Intl X7.460 deliver the same power: 160 HP.
Which is more recent, the CaseIH Puma 160 or the McCormick Intl X7.460?
The McCormick Intl X7.460 is the more recent model: production started in 2013, versus 2011 for the CaseIH Puma 160.
Which is heavier, the CaseIH Puma 160 or the McCormick Intl X7.460?
The CaseIH Puma 160 is heavier: 7420 kg versus 5751 kg for the McCormick Intl X7.460.
Which has the higher lift capacity, the CaseIH Puma 160 or the McCormick Intl X7.460?
The McCormick Intl X7.460 offers a higher rear lift capacity: 9298 kg versus 3583 kg.