CaseIH Puma 165 X vs McCormick Intl X70.50
Side-by-side specs comparison
Verdict by the numbers
- The CaseIH Puma 165 X and the McCormick Intl X70.50 deliver the same power: 165 HP.
- The CaseIH Puma 165 X is the more recent model: production started in 2018, versus 2012 for the McCormick Intl X70.50.
- The McCormick Intl X70.50 offers a higher rear lift capacity: 7198 kg versus 6616 kg.
Full specs comparison
| CaseIH Puma 165 X | McCormick Intl X70.50 | |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 165 HP | 165 HP |
| Production years | 2018+ | 2012–2022 |
| Fuel | Diesel | Diesel |
| Cylinders | 6 | 6 |
| Displacement | 6.7 L | 6.7 L |
| Weight | — | 6 500 kg |
| Drive | 4WD | 4WD |
| Transmission | Partial power shift | Power shift |
| Gears (fwd/rev) | 19 / 6 | 32 / 24 |
| Rear lift capacity | 6 616 kg | 7 198 kg |
| Wheelbase | — | 275 cm |
| Length | — | 520 cm |
| Cab | Yes | Yes |
Frequently asked questions
Which is more powerful, the CaseIH Puma 165 X or the McCormick Intl X70.50?
The CaseIH Puma 165 X and the McCormick Intl X70.50 deliver the same power: 165 HP.
Which is more recent, the CaseIH Puma 165 X or the McCormick Intl X70.50?
The CaseIH Puma 165 X is the more recent model: production started in 2018, versus 2012 for the McCormick Intl X70.50.
Which has the higher lift capacity, the CaseIH Puma 165 X or the McCormick Intl X70.50?
The McCormick Intl X70.50 offers a higher rear lift capacity: 7198 kg versus 6616 kg.
Other comparisons
CaseIH Puma 165 X vs Fendt 614 VarioCaseIH Puma 165 X vs John Deere 6165JCaseIH Puma 165 X vs Landini Landpower 180CaseIH Puma 165 X vs Massey Ferguson 7718Deutz-Fahr 6190 TTV vs McCormick Intl X70.50Deutz-Fahr TTV 620 vs McCormick Intl X70.50Massey Ferguson 6718S vs McCormick Intl X70.50Massey Ferguson 7718S vs McCormick Intl X70.50