CaseIH Puma 165 vs McCormick Intl X70.50
Side-by-side specs comparison
Verdict by the numbers
- The CaseIH Puma 165 and the McCormick Intl X70.50 deliver the same power: 165 HP.
- The CaseIH Puma 165 is the more recent model: production started in 2014, versus 2012 for the McCormick Intl X70.50.
- The McCormick Intl X70.50 offers a higher rear lift capacity: 7198 kg versus 3583 kg.
Full specs comparison
| CaseIH Puma 165 | McCormick Intl X70.50 | |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 165 HP | 165 HP |
| Production years | 2014+ | 2012–2022 |
| Fuel | Diesel | Diesel |
| Cylinders | 6 | 6 |
| Displacement | 6.7 L | 6.7 L |
| Weight | — | 6 500 kg |
| Drive | 4WD | 4WD |
| Transmission | Power shift | Power shift |
| Gears (fwd/rev) | 18 / 6 | 32 / 24 |
| Rear lift capacity | 3 583 kg | 7 198 kg |
| Wheelbase | 273 cm | 275 cm |
| Length | — | 520 cm |
| Cab | Yes | Yes |
Frequently asked questions
Which is more powerful, the CaseIH Puma 165 or the McCormick Intl X70.50?
The CaseIH Puma 165 and the McCormick Intl X70.50 deliver the same power: 165 HP.
Which is more recent, the CaseIH Puma 165 or the McCormick Intl X70.50?
The CaseIH Puma 165 is the more recent model: production started in 2014, versus 2012 for the McCormick Intl X70.50.
Which has the higher lift capacity, the CaseIH Puma 165 or the McCormick Intl X70.50?
The McCormick Intl X70.50 offers a higher rear lift capacity: 7198 kg versus 3583 kg.
Other comparisons
CaseIH Puma 165 vs Fendt 614 VarioCaseIH Puma 165 vs John Deere 6165JCaseIH Puma 165 vs Landini Landpower 180CaseIH Puma 165 vs Massey Ferguson 7618Deutz-Fahr 6190 TTV vs McCormick Intl X70.50Deutz-Fahr TTV 620 vs McCormick Intl X70.50Massey Ferguson 6718S vs McCormick Intl X70.50Massey Ferguson 7718S vs McCormick Intl X70.50