CaseIH Puma 165 vs New Holland T7.210
Side-by-side specs comparison
Verdict by the numbers
- The CaseIH Puma 165 and the New Holland T7.210 deliver the same power: 165 HP.
- The CaseIH Puma 165 is the more recent model: production started in 2014, versus 2011 for the New Holland T7.210.
- The New Holland T7.210 offers a higher rear lift capacity: 5527 kg versus 3583 kg.
Full specs comparison
| CaseIH Puma 165 | New Holland T7.210 | |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 165 HP | 165 HP |
| Production years | 2014+ | 2011–2024 |
| Fuel | Diesel | Diesel |
| Cylinders | 6 | 6 |
| Displacement | 6.7 L | 6.7 L |
| Drive | 4WD | 4WD |
| Transmission | Power shift | Power shift |
| Gears (fwd/rev) | 18 / 6 | 19 / 6 |
| Rear lift capacity | 3 583 kg | 5 527 kg |
| Wheelbase | 273 cm | 273 cm |
| Length | — | 535 cm |
| Cab | Yes | Yes |
Frequently asked questions
Which is more powerful, the CaseIH Puma 165 or the New Holland T7.210?
The CaseIH Puma 165 and the New Holland T7.210 deliver the same power: 165 HP.
Which is more recent, the CaseIH Puma 165 or the New Holland T7.210?
The CaseIH Puma 165 is the more recent model: production started in 2014, versus 2011 for the New Holland T7.210.
Which has the higher lift capacity, the CaseIH Puma 165 or the New Holland T7.210?
The New Holland T7.210 offers a higher rear lift capacity: 5527 kg versus 3583 kg.
Other comparisons
CaseIH Puma 165 vs Fendt 614 VarioCaseIH Puma 165 vs John Deere 6165JCaseIH Puma 165 vs Landini Landpower 180CaseIH Puma 165 vs Massey Ferguson 7618Challenger MT545D vs New Holland T7.210Challenger MT545E vs New Holland T7.210Fendt 614 Vario vs New Holland T7.210Landini Landpower 180 vs New Holland T7.210