CaseIH Puma 170 vs McCormick Intl X7.670
Side-by-side specs comparison
Verdict by the numbers
- The CaseIH Puma 170 is more powerful than the McCormick Intl X7.670: 167 HP versus 166 HP (+1 HP, +1%).
- The McCormick Intl X7.670 is the more recent model: production started in 2013, versus 2011 for the CaseIH Puma 170.
- The CaseIH Puma 170 is heavier: 8500 kg versus 7348 kg for the McCormick Intl X7.670.
- The McCormick Intl X7.670 offers a higher rear lift capacity: 9298 kg versus 4626 kg.
Full specs comparison
| CaseIH Puma 170 | McCormick Intl X7.670 | |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 167 HP | 166 HP |
| Production years | 2011–2013 | 2013–2023 |
| Fuel | Diesel | Diesel |
| Cylinders | 6 | 6 |
| Displacement | 6.7 L | 6.7 L |
| Weight | 8 500 kg | 7 348 kg |
| Drive | 4WD | 4WD |
| Transmission | Power shift | Power shift |
| Gears (fwd/rev) | 18 / 6 | — |
| Rear lift capacity | 4 626 kg | 9 298 kg |
| Wheelbase | 288 cm | 281 cm |
| Length | — | 535 cm |
| Cab | Yes | Yes |
Frequently asked questions
Which is more powerful, the CaseIH Puma 170 or the McCormick Intl X7.670?
The CaseIH Puma 170 is more powerful than the McCormick Intl X7.670: 167 HP versus 166 HP (+1 HP, +1%).
Which is more recent, the CaseIH Puma 170 or the McCormick Intl X7.670?
The McCormick Intl X7.670 is the more recent model: production started in 2013, versus 2011 for the CaseIH Puma 170.
Which is heavier, the CaseIH Puma 170 or the McCormick Intl X7.670?
The CaseIH Puma 170 is heavier: 8500 kg versus 7348 kg for the McCormick Intl X7.670.
Which has the higher lift capacity, the CaseIH Puma 170 or the McCormick Intl X7.670?
The McCormick Intl X7.670 offers a higher rear lift capacity: 9298 kg versus 4626 kg.