Erkunt Kiymet 95M vs McCormick Intl X10.90M
Side-by-side specs comparison
Verdict by the numbers
- The Erkunt Kiymet 95M and the McCormick Intl X10.90M deliver the same power: 91 HP.
- The McCormick Intl X10.90M is the more recent model: production started in 2011, versus 2010 for the Erkunt Kiymet 95M.
- The McCormick Intl X10.90M is heavier: 4039 kg versus 3040 kg for the Erkunt Kiymet 95M.
- The Erkunt Kiymet 95M offers a higher rear lift capacity: 3200 kg versus 2399 kg.
Full specs comparison
| Erkunt Kiymet 95M | McCormick Intl X10.90M | |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 91 HP | 91 HP |
| Production years | 2010–2020 | 2011–2014 |
| Fuel | Diesel | Diesel |
| Cylinders | 4 | 4 |
| Displacement | 4.4 L | 4.4 L |
| Weight | 3 040 kg | 4 039 kg |
| Drive | 4WD | 4WD |
| Transmission | Shuttle | Shuttle |
| Rear lift capacity | 3 200 kg | 2 399 kg |
| Wheelbase | 228 cm | 230 cm |
| Length | 414 cm | 411 cm |
| Cab | — | Yes |
Frequently asked questions
Which is more powerful, the Erkunt Kiymet 95M or the McCormick Intl X10.90M?
The Erkunt Kiymet 95M and the McCormick Intl X10.90M deliver the same power: 91 HP.
Which is more recent, the Erkunt Kiymet 95M or the McCormick Intl X10.90M?
The McCormick Intl X10.90M is the more recent model: production started in 2011, versus 2010 for the Erkunt Kiymet 95M.
Which is heavier, the Erkunt Kiymet 95M or the McCormick Intl X10.90M?
The McCormick Intl X10.90M is heavier: 4039 kg versus 3040 kg for the Erkunt Kiymet 95M.
Which has the higher lift capacity, the Erkunt Kiymet 95M or the McCormick Intl X10.90M?
The Erkunt Kiymet 95M offers a higher rear lift capacity: 3200 kg versus 2399 kg.