John Deere 4049M vs McCormick Intl X10.50M

Side-by-side specs comparison

John Deere 4049M

John Deere 4049M

49 HP · 2014–2024

View full specs
McCormick Intl X10.50M

McCormick Intl X10.50M

49 HP · 2011–2014

View full specs

Verdict by the numbers

  • The John Deere 4049M and the McCormick Intl X10.50M deliver the same power: 49 HP.
  • The John Deere 4049M is the more recent model: production started in 2014, versus 2011 for the McCormick Intl X10.50M.
  • The McCormick Intl X10.50M is heavier: 1799 kg versus 1710 kg for the John Deere 4049M.
  • The John Deere 4049M offers a higher rear lift capacity: 1419 kg versus 1130 kg.

Full specs comparison

John Deere 4049MMcCormick Intl X10.50M
Power49 HP49 HP
Production years2014–20242011–2014
FuelDieselDiesel
Cylinders4
Displacement2 L2.4 L
Weight1 710 kg1 799 kg
Drive4WD4WD
TransmissionShuttleShuttle
Rear lift capacity1 419 kg1 130 kg
Wheelbase185 cm187 cm
Length331 cm340 cm

Frequently asked questions

Which is more powerful, the John Deere 4049M or the McCormick Intl X10.50M?

The John Deere 4049M and the McCormick Intl X10.50M deliver the same power: 49 HP.

Which is more recent, the John Deere 4049M or the McCormick Intl X10.50M?

The John Deere 4049M is the more recent model: production started in 2014, versus 2011 for the McCormick Intl X10.50M.

Which is heavier, the John Deere 4049M or the McCormick Intl X10.50M?

The McCormick Intl X10.50M is heavier: 1799 kg versus 1710 kg for the John Deere 4049M.

Which has the higher lift capacity, the John Deere 4049M or the McCormick Intl X10.50M?

The John Deere 4049M offers a higher rear lift capacity: 1419 kg versus 1130 kg.

Other comparisons