John Deere 4049R vs McCormick Intl X10.50M
Side-by-side specs comparison
Verdict by the numbers
- The John Deere 4049R and the McCormick Intl X10.50M deliver the same power: 49 HP.
- The John Deere 4049R is the more recent model: production started in 2014, versus 2011 for the McCormick Intl X10.50M.
- The McCormick Intl X10.50M is heavier: 1799 kg versus 1710 kg for the John Deere 4049R.
- The John Deere 4049R offers a higher rear lift capacity: 1419 kg versus 1130 kg.
Full specs comparison
| John Deere 4049R | McCormick Intl X10.50M | |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 49 HP | 49 HP |
| Production years | 2014–2024 | 2011–2014 |
| Fuel | Diesel | Diesel |
| Cylinders | 4 | — |
| Displacement | 2 L | 2.4 L |
| Weight | 1 710 kg | 1 799 kg |
| Drive | 4WD | 4WD |
| Transmission | Shuttle | Shuttle |
| Rear lift capacity | 1 419 kg | 1 130 kg |
| Wheelbase | 185 cm | 187 cm |
| Length | 331 cm | 340 cm |
| Cab | Yes | — |
Frequently asked questions
Which is more powerful, the John Deere 4049R or the McCormick Intl X10.50M?
The John Deere 4049R and the McCormick Intl X10.50M deliver the same power: 49 HP.
Which is more recent, the John Deere 4049R or the McCormick Intl X10.50M?
The John Deere 4049R is the more recent model: production started in 2014, versus 2011 for the McCormick Intl X10.50M.
Which is heavier, the John Deere 4049R or the McCormick Intl X10.50M?
The McCormick Intl X10.50M is heavier: 1799 kg versus 1710 kg for the John Deere 4049R.
Which has the higher lift capacity, the John Deere 4049R or the McCormick Intl X10.50M?
The John Deere 4049R offers a higher rear lift capacity: 1419 kg versus 1130 kg.
Other comparisons
Deutz-Fahr 4050E Keyline vs John Deere 4049RDeutz-Fahr 4050E vs John Deere 4049RDeutz-Fahr Agrokid 230 vs John Deere 4049RIseki AT500 vs McCormick Intl X10.50MJohn Deere 4049R vs TYM T494Kubota MZ505 vs McCormick Intl X10.50MLandini Mistral 50 vs McCormick Intl X10.50MMahindra 5010 vs McCormick Intl X10.50M