John Deere 6150M vs McCormick Intl X7.660
Side-by-side specs comparison
Verdict by the numbers
- The McCormick Intl X7.660 is more powerful than the John Deere 6150M: 151 HP versus 150 HP (+1 HP, +1%).
- The McCormick Intl X7.660 is heavier: 6549 kg versus 5929 kg for the John Deere 6150M.
- The McCormick Intl X7.660 offers a higher rear lift capacity: 9298 kg versus 4075 kg.
Full specs comparison
| John Deere 6150M | McCormick Intl X7.660 | |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 150 HP | 151 HP |
| Production years | 2013–2015 | 2013–2023 |
| Fuel | Diesel | Diesel |
| Cylinders | 6 | 6 |
| Displacement | 6.8 L | 6.7 L |
| Weight | 5 929 kg | 6 549 kg |
| Drive | 2WD or 4WD | 4WD |
| Transmission | Partial power shift | Power shift |
| Rear lift capacity | 4 075 kg | 9 298 kg |
| Wheelbase | 276 cm | 275 cm |
| Length | — | 526 cm |
| Cab | Yes | Yes |
Frequently asked questions
Which is more powerful, the John Deere 6150M or the McCormick Intl X7.660?
The McCormick Intl X7.660 is more powerful than the John Deere 6150M: 151 HP versus 150 HP (+1 HP, +1%).
Which is heavier, the John Deere 6150M or the McCormick Intl X7.660?
The McCormick Intl X7.660 is heavier: 6549 kg versus 5929 kg for the John Deere 6150M.
Which has the higher lift capacity, the John Deere 6150M or the McCormick Intl X7.660?
The McCormick Intl X7.660 offers a higher rear lift capacity: 9298 kg versus 4075 kg.
Other comparisons
CaseIH Puma 150 vs John Deere 6150MChallenger MT495D vs John Deere 6150MJohn Deere 6150M vs Kubota M7-151John Deere 6150M vs Landini 6-160LJohn Deere 6R 155 vs McCormick Intl X7.660Landini Landpower 160 vs McCormick Intl X7.660Massey Ferguson 6S.155 vs McCormick Intl X7.660Massey Ferguson 7S.155 vs McCormick Intl X7.660