LS S3010 vs McCormick Intl X10.30H
Side-by-side specs comparison
Verdict by the numbers
- The LS S3010 and the McCormick Intl X10.30H deliver the same power: 28 HP.
- The McCormick Intl X10.30H is the more recent model: production started in 2011, versus 2009 for the LS S3010.
- The McCormick Intl X10.30H is heavier: 1413 kg versus 1256 kg for the LS S3010.
- The McCormick Intl X10.30H offers a higher rear lift capacity: 800 kg versus 650 kg.
Full specs comparison
| LS S3010 | McCormick Intl X10.30H | |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 28 HP | 28 HP |
| Production years | 2009–2011 | 2011–2014 |
| Fuel | Diesel | Diesel |
| Cylinders | 4 | 3 |
| Displacement | 1.5 L | 1.4 L |
| Weight | 1 256 kg | 1 413 kg |
| Drive | 4WD | 4WD |
| Transmission | Shuttle | Hydrostatic |
| Rear lift capacity | 650 kg | 800 kg |
| Wheelbase | 167 cm | 167 cm |
| Length | 266 cm | 310 cm |
Frequently asked questions
Which is more powerful, the LS S3010 or the McCormick Intl X10.30H?
The LS S3010 and the McCormick Intl X10.30H deliver the same power: 28 HP.
Which is more recent, the LS S3010 or the McCormick Intl X10.30H?
The McCormick Intl X10.30H is the more recent model: production started in 2011, versus 2009 for the LS S3010.
Which is heavier, the LS S3010 or the McCormick Intl X10.30H?
The McCormick Intl X10.30H is heavier: 1413 kg versus 1256 kg for the LS S3010.
Which has the higher lift capacity, the LS S3010 or the McCormick Intl X10.30H?
The McCormick Intl X10.30H offers a higher rear lift capacity: 800 kg versus 650 kg.