Massey Ferguson 148 vs McCormick Intl X10.50M
Side-by-side specs comparison
Verdict by the numbers
- The Massey Ferguson 148 and the McCormick Intl X10.50M deliver the same power: 49 HP.
- The McCormick Intl X10.50M is the more recent model: production started in 2011, versus 1972 for the Massey Ferguson 148.
- The McCormick Intl X10.50M is heavier: 1799 kg versus 1784 kg for the Massey Ferguson 148.
- The Massey Ferguson 148 offers a higher rear lift capacity: 1449 kg versus 1130 kg.
Full specs comparison
| Massey Ferguson 148 | McCormick Intl X10.50M | |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 49 HP | 49 HP |
| Production years | 1972–1976 | 2011–2014 |
| Fuel | Diesel | Diesel |
| Cylinders | 3 | — |
| Displacement | 2.5 L | 2.4 L |
| Weight | 1 784 kg | 1 799 kg |
| Drive | 2WD | 4WD |
| Transmission | — | Shuttle |
| Gears (fwd/rev) | 8 / 2 | — |
| Rear lift capacity | 1 449 kg | 1 130 kg |
| Wheelbase | 204 cm | 187 cm |
| Length | 326 cm | 340 cm |
Frequently asked questions
Which is more powerful, the Massey Ferguson 148 or the McCormick Intl X10.50M?
The Massey Ferguson 148 and the McCormick Intl X10.50M deliver the same power: 49 HP.
Which is more recent, the Massey Ferguson 148 or the McCormick Intl X10.50M?
The McCormick Intl X10.50M is the more recent model: production started in 2011, versus 1972 for the Massey Ferguson 148.
Which is heavier, the Massey Ferguson 148 or the McCormick Intl X10.50M?
The McCormick Intl X10.50M is heavier: 1799 kg versus 1784 kg for the Massey Ferguson 148.
Which has the higher lift capacity, the Massey Ferguson 148 or the McCormick Intl X10.50M?
The Massey Ferguson 148 offers a higher rear lift capacity: 1449 kg versus 1130 kg.
Other comparisons
International Harvester 454 vs Massey Ferguson 148International Harvester 464 vs Massey Ferguson 148Iseki AT500 vs McCormick Intl X10.50MKubota MZ505 vs McCormick Intl X10.50MLandini Mistral 50 vs McCormick Intl X10.50MMahindra 5010 vs McCormick Intl X10.50MMassey Ferguson 148 vs Renault 486Massey Ferguson 148 vs Renault 86