Massey Ferguson 3340 vs McCormick Intl X50.20
Side-by-side specs comparison
Verdict by the numbers
- The Massey Ferguson 3340 and the McCormick Intl X50.20 deliver the same power: 79 HP.
- The McCormick Intl X50.20 is the more recent model: production started in 2012, versus 2001 for the Massey Ferguson 3340.
- The McCormick Intl X50.20 offers a higher rear lift capacity: 4740 kg versus 2600 kg.
Full specs comparison
| Massey Ferguson 3340 | McCormick Intl X50.20 | |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 79 HP | 79 HP |
| Production years | 2001–2003 | 2012–2014 |
| Fuel | Diesel | Diesel |
| Cylinders | 4 | 4 |
| Displacement | 4.2 L | 3.4 L |
| Weight | — | 3 642 kg |
| Drive | 2WD or 4WD | 2WD or 4WD |
| Transmission | Shuttle | Shuttle |
| Gears (fwd/rev) | 16 / 8 | 32 / 12 |
| Rear lift capacity | 2 600 kg | 4 740 kg |
| Wheelbase | 208 cm | 236 cm |
| Length | 385 cm | 416 cm |
| Cab | Yes | Yes |
Frequently asked questions
Which is more powerful, the Massey Ferguson 3340 or the McCormick Intl X50.20?
The Massey Ferguson 3340 and the McCormick Intl X50.20 deliver the same power: 79 HP.
Which is more recent, the Massey Ferguson 3340 or the McCormick Intl X50.20?
The McCormick Intl X50.20 is the more recent model: production started in 2012, versus 2001 for the Massey Ferguson 3340.
Which has the higher lift capacity, the Massey Ferguson 3340 or the McCormick Intl X50.20?
The McCormick Intl X50.20 offers a higher rear lift capacity: 4740 kg versus 2600 kg.
Other comparisons
Branson 7845C vs McCormick Intl X50.20mBranson 7845R vs McCormick Intl X50.20mClaas 237 vs McCormick Intl X50.20Deutz-Fahr 4080.4E vs McCormick Intl X50.20mFendt 309 Vario vs McCormick Intl X50.20Fendt Farmer 280P vs Massey Ferguson 3340Fendt Farmer 280S vs Massey Ferguson 3340Fendt Farmer 280V vs Massey Ferguson 3340