Massey Ferguson 6499 vs McCormick Intl X70.80
Side-by-side specs comparison
Verdict by the numbers
- The Massey Ferguson 6499 is more powerful than the McCormick Intl X70.80: 215 HP versus 214 HP (+1 HP, +0%).
- The McCormick Intl X70.80 is the more recent model: production started in 2012, versus 2008 for the Massey Ferguson 6499.
- The McCormick Intl X70.80 offers a higher rear lift capacity: 10949 kg versus 7121 kg.
Full specs comparison
| Massey Ferguson 6499 | McCormick Intl X70.80 | |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 215 HP | 214 HP |
| Production years | 2008–2012 | 2012–2022 |
| Fuel | Diesel | Diesel |
| Cylinders | 6 | 6 |
| Displacement | 7.4 L | 6.7 L |
| Weight | — | 7 702 kg |
| Drive | 4WD | 4WD |
| Transmission | Partial power shift | Power shift |
| Gears (fwd/rev) | — | 32 / 24 |
| Rear lift capacity | 7 121 kg | 10 949 kg |
| Wheelbase | 299 cm | 287 cm |
| Length | 543 cm | 530 cm |
| Cab | Yes | Yes |
Frequently asked questions
Which is more powerful, the Massey Ferguson 6499 or the McCormick Intl X70.80?
The Massey Ferguson 6499 is more powerful than the McCormick Intl X70.80: 215 HP versus 214 HP (+1 HP, +0%).
Which is more recent, the Massey Ferguson 6499 or the McCormick Intl X70.80?
The McCormick Intl X70.80 is the more recent model: production started in 2012, versus 2008 for the Massey Ferguson 6499.
Which has the higher lift capacity, the Massey Ferguson 6499 or the McCormick Intl X70.80?
The McCormick Intl X70.80 offers a higher rear lift capacity: 10949 kg versus 7121 kg.
Other comparisons
AGCO DT180A vs Massey Ferguson 6499AGCO RT180A vs Massey Ferguson 6499CaseIH Puma 215 vs Massey Ferguson 6499Challenger MT595B vs Massey Ferguson 6499John Deere 6215R vs McCormick Intl X70.80John Deere 6R 215 vs McCormick Intl X70.80John Deere 7215R vs McCormick Intl X70.80McCormick Intl X70.80 vs Versatile 210 Nemesis