Massey Ferguson 6616 vs McCormick Intl X6.470
Side-by-side specs comparison
Verdict by the numbers
- The Massey Ferguson 6616 and the McCormick Intl X6.470 deliver the same power: 150 HP.
- The McCormick Intl X6.470 is heavier: 5987 kg versus 5670 kg for the Massey Ferguson 6616.
- The McCormick Intl X6.470 offers a higher rear lift capacity: 8382 kg versus 5171 kg.
Full specs comparison
| Massey Ferguson 6616 | McCormick Intl X6.470 | |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 150 HP | 150 HP |
| Production years | 2014–2016 | 2014–2024 |
| Fuel | Diesel | Diesel |
| Cylinders | 4 | 4 |
| Displacement | 4.9 L | 4.5 L |
| Weight | 5 670 kg | 5 987 kg |
| Drive | — | 4WD |
| Transmission | Power shift | — |
| Gears (fwd/rev) | — | 54 / 18 |
| Rear lift capacity | 5 171 kg | 8 382 kg |
| Wheelbase | 266 cm | 271 cm |
| Length | 469 cm | 525 cm |
| Cab | Yes | Yes |
Frequently asked questions
Which is more powerful, the Massey Ferguson 6616 or the McCormick Intl X6.470?
The Massey Ferguson 6616 and the McCormick Intl X6.470 deliver the same power: 150 HP.
Which is heavier, the Massey Ferguson 6616 or the McCormick Intl X6.470?
The McCormick Intl X6.470 is heavier: 5987 kg versus 5670 kg for the Massey Ferguson 6616.
Which has the higher lift capacity, the Massey Ferguson 6616 or the McCormick Intl X6.470?
The McCormick Intl X6.470 offers a higher rear lift capacity: 8382 kg versus 5171 kg.
Other comparisons
CaseIH Puma 150 vs Massey Ferguson 6616Challenger MT495D vs Massey Ferguson 6616Challenger MT535D vs Massey Ferguson 6616Kubota M7-151 vs Massey Ferguson 6616Kubota M7-163 vs McCormick Intl X6.470Massey Ferguson 7616 vs McCormick Intl X6.470McCormick Intl X6.470 vs New Holland T6.180McCormick Intl X6.470 vs New Holland T7.190