McCormick Intl X50.40 vs New Holland Workmaster 95

Side-by-side specs comparison

McCormick Intl X50.40

McCormick Intl X50.40

97 HP · 2012–2014

View full specs
New Holland Workmaster 95

New Holland Workmaster 95

97 HP · 2019+

View full specs

Verdict by the numbers

  • The McCormick Intl X50.40 and the New Holland Workmaster 95 deliver the same power: 97 HP.
  • The New Holland Workmaster 95 is the more recent model: production started in 2019, versus 2012 for the McCormick Intl X50.40.
  • The McCormick Intl X50.40 is heavier: 3642 kg versus 3509 kg for the New Holland Workmaster 95.
  • The McCormick Intl X50.40 offers a higher rear lift capacity: 4740 kg versus 1451 kg.

Full specs comparison

McCormick Intl X50.40New Holland Workmaster 95
Power97 HP97 HP
Production years2012–20142019+
FuelDieselDiesel
Cylinders44
Displacement3.4 L3.4 L
Weight3 642 kg3 509 kg
Drive2WD or 4WD4WD
TransmissionShuttleShuttle
Gears (fwd/rev)32 / 12
Rear lift capacity4 740 kg1 451 kg
Wheelbase236 cm212 cm
Length416 cm409 cm
CabYesYes

Frequently asked questions

Which is more powerful, the McCormick Intl X50.40 or the New Holland Workmaster 95?

The McCormick Intl X50.40 and the New Holland Workmaster 95 deliver the same power: 97 HP.

Which is more recent, the McCormick Intl X50.40 or the New Holland Workmaster 95?

The New Holland Workmaster 95 is the more recent model: production started in 2019, versus 2012 for the McCormick Intl X50.40.

Which is heavier, the McCormick Intl X50.40 or the New Holland Workmaster 95?

The McCormick Intl X50.40 is heavier: 3642 kg versus 3509 kg for the New Holland Workmaster 95.

Which has the higher lift capacity, the McCormick Intl X50.40 or the New Holland Workmaster 95?

The McCormick Intl X50.40 offers a higher rear lift capacity: 4740 kg versus 1451 kg.

Other comparisons