McCormick Intl X50.40m vs New Holland Workmaster 95

Side-by-side specs comparison

McCormick Intl X50.40m

McCormick Intl X50.40m

97 HP · 2014–2024

View full specs
New Holland Workmaster 95

New Holland Workmaster 95

97 HP · 2019+

View full specs

Verdict by the numbers

  • The McCormick Intl X50.40m and the New Holland Workmaster 95 deliver the same power: 97 HP.
  • The New Holland Workmaster 95 is the more recent model: production started in 2019, versus 2014 for the McCormick Intl X50.40m.
  • The New Holland Workmaster 95 is heavier: 3509 kg versus 3442 kg for the McCormick Intl X50.40m.
  • The McCormick Intl X50.40m offers a higher rear lift capacity: 2585 kg versus 1451 kg.

Full specs comparison

McCormick Intl X50.40mNew Holland Workmaster 95
Power97 HP97 HP
Production years2014–20242019+
FuelDieselDiesel
Cylinders44
Displacement3.4 L3.4 L
Weight3 442 kg3 509 kg
Drive2WD or 4WD4WD
TransmissionShuttleShuttle
Gears (fwd/rev)24 / 12
Rear lift capacity2 585 kg1 451 kg
Wheelbase233 cm212 cm
Length413 cm409 cm
CabYes

Frequently asked questions

Which is more powerful, the McCormick Intl X50.40m or the New Holland Workmaster 95?

The McCormick Intl X50.40m and the New Holland Workmaster 95 deliver the same power: 97 HP.

Which is more recent, the McCormick Intl X50.40m or the New Holland Workmaster 95?

The New Holland Workmaster 95 is the more recent model: production started in 2019, versus 2014 for the McCormick Intl X50.40m.

Which is heavier, the McCormick Intl X50.40m or the New Holland Workmaster 95?

The New Holland Workmaster 95 is heavier: 3509 kg versus 3442 kg for the McCormick Intl X50.40m.

Which has the higher lift capacity, the McCormick Intl X50.40m or the New Holland Workmaster 95?

The McCormick Intl X50.40m offers a higher rear lift capacity: 2585 kg versus 1451 kg.

Other comparisons