Cub Cadet 1440 vs John Deere 1600 Turbo
Side-by-side specs comparison
Verdict by the numbers
- The John Deere 1600 Turbo is more powerful than the Cub Cadet 1440: 64 HP versus 14 HP (+50 HP, +357%).
- The John Deere 1600 Turbo is the more recent model: production started in 2002, versus 1992 for the Cub Cadet 1440.
- The John Deere 1600 Turbo is heavier: 1791 kg versus 346 kg for the Cub Cadet 1440.
Full specs comparison
| Cub Cadet 1440 | John Deere 1600 Turbo | |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 14 HP | 64 HP |
| Production years | 1992–1997 | 2002–2006 |
| Fuel | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Cylinders | 2 | 4 |
| Weight | 346 kg | 1 791 kg |
| Drive | 2WD | 4WD |
| Transmission | Hydrostatic | Hydrostatic |
| Wheelbase | 118 cm | 152 cm |
| Length | 182 cm | 335 cm |
| Mower deck | 42" | 42" |
Frequently asked questions
Which is more powerful, the Cub Cadet 1440 or the John Deere 1600 Turbo?
The John Deere 1600 Turbo is more powerful than the Cub Cadet 1440: 64 HP versus 14 HP (+50 HP, +357%).
Which is more recent, the Cub Cadet 1440 or the John Deere 1600 Turbo?
The John Deere 1600 Turbo is the more recent model: production started in 2002, versus 1992 for the Cub Cadet 1440.
Which is heavier, the Cub Cadet 1440 or the John Deere 1600 Turbo?
The John Deere 1600 Turbo is heavier: 1791 kg versus 346 kg for the Cub Cadet 1440.