Cub Cadet 1862 vs John Deere 1600 Turbo
Side-by-side specs comparison
Verdict by the numbers
- The John Deere 1600 Turbo is more powerful than the Cub Cadet 1862: 64 HP versus 18 HP (+46 HP, +256%).
- The John Deere 1600 Turbo is the more recent model: production started in 2002, versus 1990 for the Cub Cadet 1862.
- The John Deere 1600 Turbo is heavier: 1791 kg versus 404 kg for the Cub Cadet 1862.
- The John Deere 1600 Turbo has the wider mower deck: 42" versus 38".
Full specs comparison
| Cub Cadet 1862 | John Deere 1600 Turbo | |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 18 HP | 64 HP |
| Production years | 1990–1992 | 2002–2006 |
| Fuel | Electric | Diesel |
| Cylinders | 2 | 4 |
| Weight | 404 kg | 1 791 kg |
| Drive | 2WD | 4WD |
| Transmission | Hydrostatic | Hydrostatic |
| Wheelbase | 118 cm | 152 cm |
| Length | 182 cm | 335 cm |
| Mower deck | 38" | 42" |
Frequently asked questions
Which is more powerful, the Cub Cadet 1862 or the John Deere 1600 Turbo?
The John Deere 1600 Turbo is more powerful than the Cub Cadet 1862: 64 HP versus 18 HP (+46 HP, +256%).
Which is more recent, the Cub Cadet 1862 or the John Deere 1600 Turbo?
The John Deere 1600 Turbo is the more recent model: production started in 2002, versus 1990 for the Cub Cadet 1862.
Which is heavier, the Cub Cadet 1862 or the John Deere 1600 Turbo?
The John Deere 1600 Turbo is heavier: 1791 kg versus 404 kg for the Cub Cadet 1862.
Which has the wider mower deck, the Cub Cadet 1862 or the John Deere 1600 Turbo?
The John Deere 1600 Turbo has the wider mower deck: 42" versus 38".