Cub Cadet GT 1054 vs John Deere 1600 Turbo
Side-by-side specs comparison
Verdict by the numbers
- The John Deere 1600 Turbo is more powerful than the Cub Cadet GT 1054: 64 HP versus 26 HP (+38 HP, +146%).
- The Cub Cadet GT 1054 is the more recent model: production started in 2013, versus 2002 for the John Deere 1600 Turbo.
- The John Deere 1600 Turbo is heavier: 1791 kg versus 266 kg for the Cub Cadet GT 1054.
- The Cub Cadet GT 1054 has the wider mower deck: 54" versus 42".
Full specs comparison
| Cub Cadet GT 1054 | John Deere 1600 Turbo | |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 26 HP | 64 HP |
| Production years | 2013–2014 | 2002–2006 |
| Fuel | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Cylinders | 2 | 4 |
| Weight | 266 kg | 1 791 kg |
| Drive | 2WD | 4WD |
| Transmission | Gear | Hydrostatic |
| Wheelbase | 124 cm | 152 cm |
| Length | 172 cm | 335 cm |
| Mower deck | 54" | 42" |
Frequently asked questions
Which is more powerful, the Cub Cadet GT 1054 or the John Deere 1600 Turbo?
The John Deere 1600 Turbo is more powerful than the Cub Cadet GT 1054: 64 HP versus 26 HP (+38 HP, +146%).
Which is more recent, the Cub Cadet GT 1054 or the John Deere 1600 Turbo?
The Cub Cadet GT 1054 is the more recent model: production started in 2013, versus 2002 for the John Deere 1600 Turbo.
Which is heavier, the Cub Cadet GT 1054 or the John Deere 1600 Turbo?
The John Deere 1600 Turbo is heavier: 1791 kg versus 266 kg for the Cub Cadet GT 1054.
Which has the wider mower deck, the Cub Cadet GT 1054 or the John Deere 1600 Turbo?
The Cub Cadet GT 1054 has the wider mower deck: 54" versus 42".