Cub Cadet LT 1024 vs John Deere 1600 Turbo
Side-by-side specs comparison
Verdict by the numbers
- The John Deere 1600 Turbo is more powerful than the Cub Cadet LT 1024: 64 HP versus 24 HP (+40 HP, +167%).
- The Cub Cadet LT 1024 is the more recent model: production started in 2004, versus 2002 for the John Deere 1600 Turbo.
- The John Deere 1600 Turbo is heavier: 1791 kg versus 236 kg for the Cub Cadet LT 1024.
- The Cub Cadet LT 1024 has the wider mower deck: 50" versus 42".
Full specs comparison
| Cub Cadet LT 1024 | John Deere 1600 Turbo | |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 24 HP | 64 HP |
| Production years | 2004 | 2002–2006 |
| Fuel | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Cylinders | 2 | 4 |
| Weight | 236 kg | 1 791 kg |
| Drive | 2WD | 4WD |
| Transmission | Gear | Hydrostatic |
| Wheelbase | 119 cm | 152 cm |
| Length | 172 cm | 335 cm |
| Mower deck | 50" | 42" |
Frequently asked questions
Which is more powerful, the Cub Cadet LT 1024 or the John Deere 1600 Turbo?
The John Deere 1600 Turbo is more powerful than the Cub Cadet LT 1024: 64 HP versus 24 HP (+40 HP, +167%).
Which is more recent, the Cub Cadet LT 1024 or the John Deere 1600 Turbo?
The Cub Cadet LT 1024 is the more recent model: production started in 2004, versus 2002 for the John Deere 1600 Turbo.
Which is heavier, the Cub Cadet LT 1024 or the John Deere 1600 Turbo?
The John Deere 1600 Turbo is heavier: 1791 kg versus 236 kg for the Cub Cadet LT 1024.
Which has the wider mower deck, the Cub Cadet LT 1024 or the John Deere 1600 Turbo?
The Cub Cadet LT 1024 has the wider mower deck: 50" versus 42".