Cub Cadet LTX 1042 vs John Deere 1600 Turbo
Side-by-side specs comparison
Verdict by the numbers
- The John Deere 1600 Turbo is more powerful than the Cub Cadet LTX 1042: 64 HP versus 18 HP (+46 HP, +256%).
- The Cub Cadet LTX 1042 is the more recent model: production started in 2012, versus 2002 for the John Deere 1600 Turbo.
- The John Deere 1600 Turbo is heavier: 1791 kg versus 225 kg for the Cub Cadet LTX 1042.
Full specs comparison
| Cub Cadet LTX 1042 | John Deere 1600 Turbo | |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 18 HP | 64 HP |
| Production years | 2012–2014 | 2002–2006 |
| Fuel | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Cylinders | 2 | 4 |
| Weight | 225 kg | 1 791 kg |
| Drive | 2WD | 4WD |
| Transmission | Hydrostatic | Hydrostatic |
| Wheelbase | 120 cm | 152 cm |
| Length | 175 cm | 335 cm |
| Mower deck | 42" | 42" |
Frequently asked questions
Which is more powerful, the Cub Cadet LTX 1042 or the John Deere 1600 Turbo?
The John Deere 1600 Turbo is more powerful than the Cub Cadet LTX 1042: 64 HP versus 18 HP (+46 HP, +256%).
Which is more recent, the Cub Cadet LTX 1042 or the John Deere 1600 Turbo?
The Cub Cadet LTX 1042 is the more recent model: production started in 2012, versus 2002 for the John Deere 1600 Turbo.
Which is heavier, the Cub Cadet LTX 1042 or the John Deere 1600 Turbo?
The John Deere 1600 Turbo is heavier: 1791 kg versus 225 kg for the Cub Cadet LTX 1042.