Cub Cadet Recon 60 vs John Deere 1600 Turbo
Side-by-side specs comparison
Verdict by the numbers
- The John Deere 1600 Turbo is more powerful than the Cub Cadet Recon 60: 64 HP versus 25 HP (+39 HP, +156%).
- The Cub Cadet Recon 60 is the more recent model: production started in 2008, versus 2002 for the John Deere 1600 Turbo.
- The John Deere 1600 Turbo is heavier: 1791 kg versus 469 kg for the Cub Cadet Recon 60.
- The Cub Cadet Recon 60 has the wider mower deck: 60" versus 42".
Full specs comparison
| Cub Cadet Recon 60 | John Deere 1600 Turbo | |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 25 HP | 64 HP |
| Production years | 2008–2009 | 2002–2006 |
| Fuel | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Cylinders | 2 | 4 |
| Weight | 469 kg | 1 791 kg |
| Drive | 2WD | 4WD |
| Transmission | Hydrostatic | Hydrostatic |
| Wheelbase | 113 cm | 152 cm |
| Length | 198 cm | 335 cm |
| Mower deck | 60" | 42" |
Frequently asked questions
Which is more powerful, the Cub Cadet Recon 60 or the John Deere 1600 Turbo?
The John Deere 1600 Turbo is more powerful than the Cub Cadet Recon 60: 64 HP versus 25 HP (+39 HP, +156%).
Which is more recent, the Cub Cadet Recon 60 or the John Deere 1600 Turbo?
The Cub Cadet Recon 60 is the more recent model: production started in 2008, versus 2002 for the John Deere 1600 Turbo.
Which is heavier, the Cub Cadet Recon 60 or the John Deere 1600 Turbo?
The John Deere 1600 Turbo is heavier: 1791 kg versus 469 kg for the Cub Cadet Recon 60.
Which has the wider mower deck, the Cub Cadet Recon 60 or the John Deere 1600 Turbo?
The Cub Cadet Recon 60 has the wider mower deck: 60" versus 42".