Cub Cadet RZT 42 vs John Deere 1600 Turbo
Side-by-side specs comparison
Verdict by the numbers
- The John Deere 1600 Turbo is more powerful than the Cub Cadet RZT 42: 64 HP versus 17 HP (+47 HP, +276%).
- The Cub Cadet RZT 42 is the more recent model: production started in 2005, versus 2002 for the John Deere 1600 Turbo.
Full specs comparison
| Cub Cadet RZT 42 | John Deere 1600 Turbo | |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 17 HP | 64 HP |
| Production years | 2005–2012 | 2002–2006 |
| Fuel | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Cylinders | 1 | 4 |
| Weight | — | 1 791 kg |
| Drive | 2WD | 4WD |
| Transmission | Gear | Hydrostatic |
| Wheelbase | — | 152 cm |
| Length | — | 335 cm |
| Mower deck | 42" | 42" |
Frequently asked questions
Which is more powerful, the Cub Cadet RZT 42 or the John Deere 1600 Turbo?
The John Deere 1600 Turbo is more powerful than the Cub Cadet RZT 42: 64 HP versus 17 HP (+47 HP, +276%).
Which is more recent, the Cub Cadet RZT 42 or the John Deere 1600 Turbo?
The Cub Cadet RZT 42 is the more recent model: production started in 2005, versus 2002 for the John Deere 1600 Turbo.