Cub Cadet Tank S7237 vs Ford GT-65
Side-by-side specs comparison
Verdict by the numbers
- The Cub Cadet Tank S7237 is more powerful than the Ford GT-65: 37 HP versus 14 HP (+23 HP, +164%).
- The Cub Cadet Tank S7237 is the more recent model: production started in 2009, versus 1992 for the Ford GT-65.
- The Cub Cadet Tank S7237 is heavier: 698 kg versus 476 kg for the Ford GT-65.
- The Cub Cadet Tank S7237 has the wider mower deck: 72" versus 44".
Full specs comparison
| Cub Cadet Tank S7237 | Ford GT-65 | |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 37 HP | 14 HP |
| Production years | 2009–2012 | 1992–1997 |
| Fuel | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Cylinders | 2 | 3 |
| Weight | 698 kg | 476 kg |
| Drive | — | 2WD |
| Transmission | Gear | Hydrostatic |
| Wheelbase | 137 cm | 126 cm |
| Length | 228 cm | 189 cm |
| Mower deck | 72" | 44" |
Frequently asked questions
Which is more powerful, the Cub Cadet Tank S7237 or the Ford GT-65?
The Cub Cadet Tank S7237 is more powerful than the Ford GT-65: 37 HP versus 14 HP (+23 HP, +164%).
Which is more recent, the Cub Cadet Tank S7237 or the Ford GT-65?
The Cub Cadet Tank S7237 is the more recent model: production started in 2009, versus 1992 for the Ford GT-65.
Which is heavier, the Cub Cadet Tank S7237 or the Ford GT-65?
The Cub Cadet Tank S7237 is heavier: 698 kg versus 476 kg for the Ford GT-65.
Which has the wider mower deck, the Cub Cadet Tank S7237 or the Ford GT-65?
The Cub Cadet Tank S7237 has the wider mower deck: 72" versus 44".
Other comparisons
Cub Cadet Tank S7237 vs John Deere 1565 Series IICub Cadet Tank S7237 vs John Deere Z970ACub Cadet Tank S7237 vs Montana lawn tractors MTZ 3572Cub Cadet Tank S7237 vs Montana lawn tractors MZT 3560Ford GT-65 vs Simplicity 14LTHFord GT-65 vs Simplicity Broadmoor 14HVFord GT-65 vs Simplicity Landlord 14Ford GT-65 vs Simplicity Regent 14G