Cub Cadet ZTT 42 vs John Deere 1600 Turbo
Side-by-side specs comparison
Verdict by the numbers
- The John Deere 1600 Turbo is more powerful than the Cub Cadet ZTT 42: 64 HP versus 18 HP (+46 HP, +256%).
- The Cub Cadet ZTT 42 is the more recent model: production started in 2010, versus 2002 for the John Deere 1600 Turbo.
- The John Deere 1600 Turbo is heavier: 1791 kg versus 242 kg for the Cub Cadet ZTT 42.
Full specs comparison
| Cub Cadet ZTT 42 | John Deere 1600 Turbo | |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 18 HP | 64 HP |
| Production years | 2010–2011 | 2002–2006 |
| Fuel | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Cylinders | 1 | 4 |
| Weight | 242 kg | 1 791 kg |
| Drive | 2WD | 4WD |
| Transmission | Gear | Hydrostatic |
| Wheelbase | 120 cm | 152 cm |
| Length | 175 cm | 335 cm |
| Mower deck | 42" | 42" |
Frequently asked questions
Which is more powerful, the Cub Cadet ZTT 42 or the John Deere 1600 Turbo?
The John Deere 1600 Turbo is more powerful than the Cub Cadet ZTT 42: 64 HP versus 18 HP (+46 HP, +256%).
Which is more recent, the Cub Cadet ZTT 42 or the John Deere 1600 Turbo?
The Cub Cadet ZTT 42 is the more recent model: production started in 2010, versus 2002 for the John Deere 1600 Turbo.
Which is heavier, the Cub Cadet ZTT 42 or the John Deere 1600 Turbo?
The John Deere 1600 Turbo is heavier: 1791 kg versus 242 kg for the Cub Cadet ZTT 42.