Ford RMT 526 vs John Deere 1600 Turbo
Side-by-side specs comparison
Verdict by the numbers
- The John Deere 1600 Turbo is more powerful than the Ford RMT 526: 64 HP versus 5 HP (+59 HP, +1180%).
- The John Deere 1600 Turbo is the more recent model: production started in 2002, versus 1977 for the Ford RMT 526.
- The John Deere 1600 Turbo is heavier: 1791 kg versus 120 kg for the Ford RMT 526.
- The John Deere 1600 Turbo has the wider mower deck: 42" versus 26".
Full specs comparison
| Ford RMT 526 | John Deere 1600 Turbo | |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 5 HP | 64 HP |
| Production years | 1977–1980 | 2002–2006 |
| Fuel | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Cylinders | 1 | 4 |
| Weight | 120 kg | 1 791 kg |
| Drive | 2WD | 4WD |
| Transmission | — | Hydrostatic |
| Gears (fwd/rev) | 5 / 1 | — |
| Wheelbase | 100 cm | 152 cm |
| Length | 142 cm | 335 cm |
| Mower deck | 26" | 42" |
Frequently asked questions
Which is more powerful, the Ford RMT 526 or the John Deere 1600 Turbo?
The John Deere 1600 Turbo is more powerful than the Ford RMT 526: 64 HP versus 5 HP (+59 HP, +1180%).
Which is more recent, the Ford RMT 526 or the John Deere 1600 Turbo?
The John Deere 1600 Turbo is the more recent model: production started in 2002, versus 1977 for the Ford RMT 526.
Which is heavier, the Ford RMT 526 or the John Deere 1600 Turbo?
The John Deere 1600 Turbo is heavier: 1791 kg versus 120 kg for the Ford RMT 526.
Which has the wider mower deck, the Ford RMT 526 or the John Deere 1600 Turbo?
The John Deere 1600 Turbo has the wider mower deck: 42" versus 26".