John Deere 1600 Turbo Series III vs Massey Ferguson lawn tractors 2717H

Side-by-side specs comparison

John Deere 1600 Turbo Series III

John Deere 1600 Turbo Series III

60 HP · 2018+

View full specs
Massey Ferguson lawn tractors 2717H

Massey Ferguson lawn tractors 2717H

17 HP · 1996–2000

View full specs

Verdict by the numbers

  • The John Deere 1600 Turbo Series III is more powerful than the Massey Ferguson lawn tractors 2717H: 60 HP versus 17 HP (+43 HP, +253%).
  • The John Deere 1600 Turbo Series III is the more recent model: production started in 2018, versus 1996 for the Massey Ferguson lawn tractors 2717H.
  • The John Deere 1600 Turbo Series III is heavier: 1892 kg versus 246 kg for the Massey Ferguson lawn tractors 2717H.
  • The Massey Ferguson lawn tractors 2717H has the wider mower deck: 50" versus 42".

Full specs comparison

John Deere 1600 Turbo Series IIIMassey Ferguson lawn tractors 2717H
Power60 HP17 HP
Production years2018+1996–2000
FuelDieselGasoline
Cylinders42
Weight1 892 kg246 kg
Drive4WD2WD
TransmissionHydrostaticGear
Wheelbase154 cm130 cm
Length335 cm182 cm
CabYes
Mower deck42"50"

Frequently asked questions

Which is more powerful, the John Deere 1600 Turbo Series III or the Massey Ferguson lawn tractors 2717H?

The John Deere 1600 Turbo Series III is more powerful than the Massey Ferguson lawn tractors 2717H: 60 HP versus 17 HP (+43 HP, +253%).

Which is more recent, the John Deere 1600 Turbo Series III or the Massey Ferguson lawn tractors 2717H?

The John Deere 1600 Turbo Series III is the more recent model: production started in 2018, versus 1996 for the Massey Ferguson lawn tractors 2717H.

Which is heavier, the John Deere 1600 Turbo Series III or the Massey Ferguson lawn tractors 2717H?

The John Deere 1600 Turbo Series III is heavier: 1892 kg versus 246 kg for the Massey Ferguson lawn tractors 2717H.

Which has the wider mower deck, the John Deere 1600 Turbo Series III or the Massey Ferguson lawn tractors 2717H?

The Massey Ferguson lawn tractors 2717H has the wider mower deck: 50" versus 42".

Other comparisons