John Deere 1600 Turbo Series III vs Massey Ferguson lawn tractors 2825H

Side-by-side specs comparison

John Deere 1600 Turbo Series III

John Deere 1600 Turbo Series III

60 HP · 2018+

View full specs
Massey Ferguson lawn tractors 2825H

Massey Ferguson lawn tractors 2825H

25 HP · 2007–2010

View full specs

Verdict by the numbers

  • The John Deere 1600 Turbo Series III is more powerful than the Massey Ferguson lawn tractors 2825H: 60 HP versus 25 HP (+35 HP, +140%).
  • The John Deere 1600 Turbo Series III is the more recent model: production started in 2018, versus 2007 for the Massey Ferguson lawn tractors 2825H.
  • The John Deere 1600 Turbo Series III is heavier: 1892 kg versus 358 kg for the Massey Ferguson lawn tractors 2825H.
  • The Massey Ferguson lawn tractors 2825H has the wider mower deck: 50" versus 42".

Full specs comparison

John Deere 1600 Turbo Series IIIMassey Ferguson lawn tractors 2825H
Power60 HP25 HP
Production years2018+2007–2010
FuelDieselGasoline
Cylinders42
Weight1 892 kg358 kg
Drive4WD2WD
TransmissionHydrostaticHydrostatic
Wheelbase154 cm134 cm
Length335 cm190 cm
Mower deck42"50"

Frequently asked questions

Which is more powerful, the John Deere 1600 Turbo Series III or the Massey Ferguson lawn tractors 2825H?

The John Deere 1600 Turbo Series III is more powerful than the Massey Ferguson lawn tractors 2825H: 60 HP versus 25 HP (+35 HP, +140%).

Which is more recent, the John Deere 1600 Turbo Series III or the Massey Ferguson lawn tractors 2825H?

The John Deere 1600 Turbo Series III is the more recent model: production started in 2018, versus 2007 for the Massey Ferguson lawn tractors 2825H.

Which is heavier, the John Deere 1600 Turbo Series III or the Massey Ferguson lawn tractors 2825H?

The John Deere 1600 Turbo Series III is heavier: 1892 kg versus 358 kg for the Massey Ferguson lawn tractors 2825H.

Which has the wider mower deck, the John Deere 1600 Turbo Series III or the Massey Ferguson lawn tractors 2825H?

The Massey Ferguson lawn tractors 2825H has the wider mower deck: 50" versus 42".

Other comparisons