John Deere 1600 Turbo Series III vs Massey Ferguson lawn tractors 2827H

Side-by-side specs comparison

John Deere 1600 Turbo Series III

John Deere 1600 Turbo Series III

60 HP · 2018+

View full specs
Massey Ferguson lawn tractors 2827H

Massey Ferguson lawn tractors 2827H

27 HP · 2007–2012

View full specs

Verdict by the numbers

  • The John Deere 1600 Turbo Series III is more powerful than the Massey Ferguson lawn tractors 2827H: 60 HP versus 27 HP (+33 HP, +122%).
  • The John Deere 1600 Turbo Series III is the more recent model: production started in 2018, versus 2007 for the Massey Ferguson lawn tractors 2827H.
  • The John Deere 1600 Turbo Series III is heavier: 1892 kg versus 302 kg for the Massey Ferguson lawn tractors 2827H.
  • The Massey Ferguson lawn tractors 2827H has the wider mower deck: 54" versus 42".

Full specs comparison

John Deere 1600 Turbo Series IIIMassey Ferguson lawn tractors 2827H
Power60 HP27 HP
Production years2018+2007–2012
FuelDieselGasoline
Cylinders42
Weight1 892 kg302 kg
Drive4WD2WD
TransmissionHydrostaticHydrostatic
Wheelbase154 cm134 cm
Length335 cm190 cm
Mower deck42"54"

Frequently asked questions

Which is more powerful, the John Deere 1600 Turbo Series III or the Massey Ferguson lawn tractors 2827H?

The John Deere 1600 Turbo Series III is more powerful than the Massey Ferguson lawn tractors 2827H: 60 HP versus 27 HP (+33 HP, +122%).

Which is more recent, the John Deere 1600 Turbo Series III or the Massey Ferguson lawn tractors 2827H?

The John Deere 1600 Turbo Series III is the more recent model: production started in 2018, versus 2007 for the Massey Ferguson lawn tractors 2827H.

Which is heavier, the John Deere 1600 Turbo Series III or the Massey Ferguson lawn tractors 2827H?

The John Deere 1600 Turbo Series III is heavier: 1892 kg versus 302 kg for the Massey Ferguson lawn tractors 2827H.

Which has the wider mower deck, the John Deere 1600 Turbo Series III or the Massey Ferguson lawn tractors 2827H?

The Massey Ferguson lawn tractors 2827H has the wider mower deck: 54" versus 42".

Other comparisons