John Deere 1600 Turbo Series III vs Massey Ferguson lawn tractors FC33

Side-by-side specs comparison

John Deere 1600 Turbo Series III

John Deere 1600 Turbo Series III

60 HP · 2018+

View full specs
Massey Ferguson lawn tractors FC33

Massey Ferguson lawn tractors FC33

33 HP · 2001–2003

View full specs

Verdict by the numbers

  • The John Deere 1600 Turbo Series III is more powerful than the Massey Ferguson lawn tractors FC33: 60 HP versus 33 HP (+27 HP, +82%).
  • The John Deere 1600 Turbo Series III is the more recent model: production started in 2018, versus 2001 for the Massey Ferguson lawn tractors FC33.
  • The John Deere 1600 Turbo Series III is heavier: 1892 kg versus 889 kg for the Massey Ferguson lawn tractors FC33.
  • The Massey Ferguson lawn tractors FC33 has the wider mower deck: 72" versus 42".

Full specs comparison

John Deere 1600 Turbo Series IIIMassey Ferguson lawn tractors FC33
Power60 HP33 HP
Production years2018+2001–2003
FuelDieselElectric
Cylinders4
Weight1 892 kg889 kg
Drive4WD4WD
TransmissionHydrostaticHydrostatic
Wheelbase154 cm123 cm
Length335 cm231 cm
Mower deck42"72"

Frequently asked questions

Which is more powerful, the John Deere 1600 Turbo Series III or the Massey Ferguson lawn tractors FC33?

The John Deere 1600 Turbo Series III is more powerful than the Massey Ferguson lawn tractors FC33: 60 HP versus 33 HP (+27 HP, +82%).

Which is more recent, the John Deere 1600 Turbo Series III or the Massey Ferguson lawn tractors FC33?

The John Deere 1600 Turbo Series III is the more recent model: production started in 2018, versus 2001 for the Massey Ferguson lawn tractors FC33.

Which is heavier, the John Deere 1600 Turbo Series III or the Massey Ferguson lawn tractors FC33?

The John Deere 1600 Turbo Series III is heavier: 1892 kg versus 889 kg for the Massey Ferguson lawn tractors FC33.

Which has the wider mower deck, the John Deere 1600 Turbo Series III or the Massey Ferguson lawn tractors FC33?

The Massey Ferguson lawn tractors FC33 has the wider mower deck: 72" versus 42".

Other comparisons