John Deere 1600 Turbo vs Scotts 46572X
Side-by-side specs comparison
Verdict by the numbers
- The John Deere 1600 Turbo is more powerful than the Scotts 46572X: 64 HP versus 19 HP (+45 HP, +237%).
- The John Deere 1600 Turbo is the more recent model: production started in 2002, versus 1998 for the Scotts 46572X.
- The Scotts 46572X has the wider mower deck: 46" versus 42".
Full specs comparison
| John Deere 1600 Turbo | Scotts 46572X | |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 64 HP | 19 HP |
| Production years | 2002–2006 | 1998 |
| Fuel | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Cylinders | 4 | 2 |
| Weight | 1 791 kg | — |
| Drive | 4WD | 2WD |
| Transmission | Hydrostatic | Hydrostatic |
| Wheelbase | 152 cm | — |
| Length | 335 cm | — |
| Mower deck | 42" | 46" |
Frequently asked questions
Which is more powerful, the John Deere 1600 Turbo or the Scotts 46572X?
The John Deere 1600 Turbo is more powerful than the Scotts 46572X: 64 HP versus 19 HP (+45 HP, +237%).
Which is more recent, the John Deere 1600 Turbo or the Scotts 46572X?
The John Deere 1600 Turbo is the more recent model: production started in 2002, versus 1998 for the Scotts 46572X.
Which has the wider mower deck, the John Deere 1600 Turbo or the Scotts 46572X?
The Scotts 46572X has the wider mower deck: 46" versus 42".