John Deere 1600 Turbo vs Scotts S2546
Side-by-side specs comparison
Verdict by the numbers
- The John Deere 1600 Turbo is more powerful than the Scotts S2546: 64 HP versus 25 HP (+39 HP, +156%).
- The John Deere 1600 Turbo is the more recent model: production started in 2002, versus 1999 for the Scotts S2546.
- The John Deere 1600 Turbo is heavier: 1791 kg versus 184 kg for the Scotts S2546.
- The Scotts S2546 has the wider mower deck: 46" versus 42".
Full specs comparison
| John Deere 1600 Turbo | Scotts S2546 | |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 64 HP | 25 HP |
| Production years | 2002–2006 | 1999–2000 |
| Fuel | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Cylinders | 4 | 2 |
| Weight | 1 791 kg | 184 kg |
| Drive | 4WD | 2WD |
| Transmission | Hydrostatic | Hydrostatic |
| Wheelbase | 152 cm | — |
| Length | 335 cm | 152 cm |
| Mower deck | 42" | 46" |
Frequently asked questions
Which is more powerful, the John Deere 1600 Turbo or the Scotts S2546?
The John Deere 1600 Turbo is more powerful than the Scotts S2546: 64 HP versus 25 HP (+39 HP, +156%).
Which is more recent, the John Deere 1600 Turbo or the Scotts S2546?
The John Deere 1600 Turbo is the more recent model: production started in 2002, versus 1999 for the Scotts S2546.
Which is heavier, the John Deere 1600 Turbo or the Scotts S2546?
The John Deere 1600 Turbo is heavier: 1791 kg versus 184 kg for the Scotts S2546.
Which has the wider mower deck, the John Deere 1600 Turbo or the Scotts S2546?
The Scotts S2546 has the wider mower deck: 46" versus 42".