John Deere 1600 Turbo vs Wheel Horse Commando 6
Side-by-side specs comparison
Verdict by the numbers
- The John Deere 1600 Turbo is more powerful than the Wheel Horse Commando 6: 64 HP versus 6 HP (+58 HP, +967%).
- The John Deere 1600 Turbo is the more recent model: production started in 2002, versus 1968 for the Wheel Horse Commando 6.
- The John Deere 1600 Turbo is heavier: 1791 kg versus 180 kg for the Wheel Horse Commando 6.
- The John Deere 1600 Turbo has the wider mower deck: 42" versus 32".
Full specs comparison
| John Deere 1600 Turbo | Wheel Horse Commando 6 | |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 64 HP | 6 HP |
| Production years | 2002–2006 | 1968 |
| Fuel | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Cylinders | 4 | 1 |
| Weight | 1 791 kg | 180 kg |
| Drive | 4WD | 2WD |
| Transmission | Hydrostatic | Gear |
| Gears (fwd/rev) | — | 3 / 1 |
| Wheelbase | 152 cm | 104 cm |
| Length | 335 cm | 154 cm |
| Mower deck | 42" | 32" |
Frequently asked questions
Which is more powerful, the John Deere 1600 Turbo or the Wheel Horse Commando 6?
The John Deere 1600 Turbo is more powerful than the Wheel Horse Commando 6: 64 HP versus 6 HP (+58 HP, +967%).
Which is more recent, the John Deere 1600 Turbo or the Wheel Horse Commando 6?
The John Deere 1600 Turbo is the more recent model: production started in 2002, versus 1968 for the Wheel Horse Commando 6.
Which is heavier, the John Deere 1600 Turbo or the Wheel Horse Commando 6?
The John Deere 1600 Turbo is heavier: 1791 kg versus 180 kg for the Wheel Horse Commando 6.
Which has the wider mower deck, the John Deere 1600 Turbo or the Wheel Horse Commando 6?
The John Deere 1600 Turbo has the wider mower deck: 42" versus 32".