Advance-Rumely OilPull E 30/60 vs Minneapolis 40-80
Side-by-side specs comparison
Verdict by the numbers
- The Minneapolis 40-80 is more powerful than the Advance-Rumely OilPull E 30/60: 88 HP versus 84 HP (+4 HP, +5%).
- The Minneapolis 40-80 is the more recent model: production started in 1918, versus 1910 for the Advance-Rumely OilPull E 30/60.
- The Advance-Rumely OilPull E 30/60 is heavier: 11929 kg versus 10206 kg for the Minneapolis 40-80.
Full specs comparison
| Advance-Rumely OilPull E 30/60 | Minneapolis 40-80 | |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 84 HP | 88 HP |
| Production years | 1910–1923 | 1918–1919 |
| Fuel | Kerosene | Kerosene |
| Cylinders | 2 | 4 |
| Displacement | 30.9 L | 24.4 L |
| Weight | 11 929 kg | 10 206 kg |
| Drive | 2WD | 2WD |
| Transmission | Gear | Gear |
| Gears (fwd/rev) | — | 2 / 1 |
| Wheelbase | — | 345 cm |
| Length | 579 cm | 523 cm |
Frequently asked questions
Which is more powerful, the Advance-Rumely OilPull E 30/60 or the Minneapolis 40-80?
The Minneapolis 40-80 is more powerful than the Advance-Rumely OilPull E 30/60: 88 HP versus 84 HP (+4 HP, +5%).
Which is more recent, the Advance-Rumely OilPull E 30/60 or the Minneapolis 40-80?
The Minneapolis 40-80 is the more recent model: production started in 1918, versus 1910 for the Advance-Rumely OilPull E 30/60.
Which is heavier, the Advance-Rumely OilPull E 30/60 or the Minneapolis 40-80?
The Advance-Rumely OilPull E 30/60 is heavier: 11929 kg versus 10206 kg for the Minneapolis 40-80.