AGCO RT100A vs CaseIH MXM130
Side-by-side specs comparison
Verdict by the numbers
- The CaseIH MXM130 is more powerful than the AGCO RT100A: 129 HP versus 128 HP (+1 HP, +1%).
- The AGCO RT100A is the more recent model: production started in 2006, versus 2002 for the CaseIH MXM130.
- The AGCO RT100A is heavier: 6849 kg versus 5404 kg for the CaseIH MXM130.
- The CaseIH MXM130 offers a higher rear lift capacity: 3957 kg versus 3855 kg.
Full specs comparison
| AGCO RT100A | CaseIH MXM130 | |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 128 HP | 129 HP |
| Production years | 2006–2007 | 2002–2007 |
| Fuel | Diesel | Diesel |
| Cylinders | 6 | 6 |
| Displacement | 6.6 L | 7.5 L |
| Weight | 6 849 kg | 5 404 kg |
| Drive | 2WD or 4WD | 2WD or 4WD |
| Transmission | CVT | Partial power shift |
| Gears (fwd/rev) | — | 18 / 6 |
| Rear lift capacity | 3 855 kg | 3 957 kg |
| Wheelbase | 278 cm | 274 cm |
| Cab | Yes | Yes |
Frequently asked questions
Which is more powerful, the AGCO RT100A or the CaseIH MXM130?
The CaseIH MXM130 is more powerful than the AGCO RT100A: 129 HP versus 128 HP (+1 HP, +1%).
Which is more recent, the AGCO RT100A or the CaseIH MXM130?
The AGCO RT100A is the more recent model: production started in 2006, versus 2002 for the CaseIH MXM130.
Which is heavier, the AGCO RT100A or the CaseIH MXM130?
The AGCO RT100A is heavier: 6849 kg versus 5404 kg for the CaseIH MXM130.
Which has the higher lift capacity, the AGCO RT100A or the CaseIH MXM130?
The CaseIH MXM130 offers a higher rear lift capacity: 3957 kg versus 3855 kg.