Apollo 254 vs Massey Ferguson GC1715
Side-by-side specs comparison
Verdict by the numbers
- The Apollo 254 and the Massey Ferguson GC1715 deliver the same power: 25 HP.
- The Massey Ferguson GC1715 is the more recent model: production started in 2013, versus 2012 for the Apollo 254.
- The Apollo 254 is heavier: 1655 kg versus 650 kg for the Massey Ferguson GC1715.
- The Apollo 254 offers a higher rear lift capacity: 600 kg versus 539 kg.
Full specs comparison
| Apollo 254 | Massey Ferguson GC1715 | |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 25 HP | 25 HP |
| Production years | 2012–2022 | 2013–2018 |
| Fuel | Diesel | Diesel |
| Cylinders | 3 | 3 |
| Displacement | 1.5 L | 1.1 L |
| Weight | 1 655 kg | 650 kg |
| Drive | 4WD | 4WD |
| Transmission | Gear | Hydrostatic |
| Gears (fwd/rev) | 9 / 3 | — |
| Rear lift capacity | 600 kg | 539 kg |
| Wheelbase | — | 145 cm |
| Length | 389 cm | 247 cm |
Frequently asked questions
Which is more powerful, the Apollo 254 or the Massey Ferguson GC1715?
The Apollo 254 and the Massey Ferguson GC1715 deliver the same power: 25 HP.
Which is more recent, the Apollo 254 or the Massey Ferguson GC1715?
The Massey Ferguson GC1715 is the more recent model: production started in 2013, versus 2012 for the Apollo 254.
Which is heavier, the Apollo 254 or the Massey Ferguson GC1715?
The Apollo 254 is heavier: 1655 kg versus 650 kg for the Massey Ferguson GC1715.
Which has the higher lift capacity, the Apollo 254 or the Massey Ferguson GC1715?
The Apollo 254 offers a higher rear lift capacity: 600 kg versus 539 kg.