CaseIH Farmall 30B vs McCormick Intl X10.30H
Side-by-side specs comparison
Verdict by the numbers
- The CaseIH Farmall 30B and the McCormick Intl X10.30H deliver the same power: 28 HP.
- The CaseIH Farmall 30B is the more recent model: production started in 2012, versus 2011 for the McCormick Intl X10.30H.
- The CaseIH Farmall 30B is heavier: 1415 kg versus 1413 kg for the McCormick Intl X10.30H.
- The CaseIH Farmall 30B offers a higher rear lift capacity: 819 kg versus 800 kg.
Full specs comparison
| CaseIH Farmall 30B | McCormick Intl X10.30H | |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 28 HP | 28 HP |
| Production years | 2012–2014 | 2011–2014 |
| Fuel | Diesel | Diesel |
| Cylinders | 4 | 3 |
| Displacement | 1.5 L | 1.4 L |
| Weight | 1 415 kg | 1 413 kg |
| Drive | 4WD | 4WD |
| Transmission | Partial power shift | Hydrostatic |
| Rear lift capacity | 819 kg | 800 kg |
| Wheelbase | 167 cm | 167 cm |
| Length | 302 cm | 310 cm |
Frequently asked questions
Which is more powerful, the CaseIH Farmall 30B or the McCormick Intl X10.30H?
The CaseIH Farmall 30B and the McCormick Intl X10.30H deliver the same power: 28 HP.
Which is more recent, the CaseIH Farmall 30B or the McCormick Intl X10.30H?
The CaseIH Farmall 30B is the more recent model: production started in 2012, versus 2011 for the McCormick Intl X10.30H.
Which is heavier, the CaseIH Farmall 30B or the McCormick Intl X10.30H?
The CaseIH Farmall 30B is heavier: 1415 kg versus 1413 kg for the McCormick Intl X10.30H.
Which has the higher lift capacity, the CaseIH Farmall 30B or the McCormick Intl X10.30H?
The CaseIH Farmall 30B offers a higher rear lift capacity: 819 kg versus 800 kg.
Other comparisons
Branson 2800 vs CaseIH Farmall 30BCaseIH Farmall 30B vs Mitsubishi GA28CaseIH Farmall 30B vs New Holland Boomer 30CaseIH Farmall 30B vs Yanmar Ex2900Kioti CK3010 vs McCormick Intl X10.30HKubota B2920 vs McCormick Intl X10.30HLS S3010 vs McCormick Intl X10.30HMahindra Max 28 XL vs McCormick Intl X10.30H