CaseIH MX170 vs Challenger MT565
Side-by-side specs comparison
Verdict by the numbers
- The CaseIH MX170 and the Challenger MT565 deliver the same power: 161 HP.
- The Challenger MT565 is the more recent model: production started in 2002, versus 1998 for the CaseIH MX170.
- The Challenger MT565 is heavier: 7055 kg versus 6395 kg for the CaseIH MX170.
- The CaseIH MX170 offers a higher rear lift capacity: 6684 kg versus 6577 kg.
Full specs comparison
| CaseIH MX170 | Challenger MT565 | |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 161 HP | 161 HP |
| Production years | 1998–2002 | 2002–2003 |
| Fuel | Diesel | Diesel |
| Cylinders | 6 | 6 |
| Displacement | 5.9 L | 6.6 L |
| Weight | 6 395 kg | 7 055 kg |
| Drive | 2WD or 4WD | 2WD or 4WD |
| Transmission | Partial power shift | Power shift |
| Gears (fwd/rev) | 16 / 12 | 18 / 6 |
| Rear lift capacity | 6 684 kg | 6 577 kg |
| Wheelbase | 284 cm | 282 cm |
| Length | 524 cm | 502 cm |
| Cab | Yes | Yes |
Frequently asked questions
Which is more powerful, the CaseIH MX170 or the Challenger MT565?
The CaseIH MX170 and the Challenger MT565 deliver the same power: 161 HP.
Which is more recent, the CaseIH MX170 or the Challenger MT565?
The Challenger MT565 is the more recent model: production started in 2002, versus 1998 for the CaseIH MX170.
Which is heavier, the CaseIH MX170 or the Challenger MT565?
The Challenger MT565 is heavier: 7055 kg versus 6395 kg for the CaseIH MX170.
Which has the higher lift capacity, the CaseIH MX170 or the Challenger MT565?
The CaseIH MX170 offers a higher rear lift capacity: 6684 kg versus 6577 kg.

