CaseIH Puma 140 X vs Challenger MT525E
Side-by-side specs comparison
Verdict by the numbers
- The CaseIH Puma 140 X and the Challenger MT525E deliver the same power: 140 HP.
- The CaseIH Puma 140 X is the more recent model: production started in 2018, versus 2015 for the Challenger MT525E.
- The CaseIH Puma 140 X offers a higher rear lift capacity: 6616 kg versus 4037 kg.
Full specs comparison
| CaseIH Puma 140 X | Challenger MT525E | |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 140 HP | 140 HP |
| Production years | 2018+ | 2015–2020 |
| Fuel | Diesel | Diesel |
| Cylinders | 6 | 6 |
| Displacement | 6.7 L | 6.6 L |
| Drive | 4WD | 4WD |
| Transmission | Partial power shift | Power shift |
| Gears (fwd/rev) | 18 / 6 | — |
| Rear lift capacity | 6 616 kg | 4 037 kg |
| Cab | Yes | Yes |
Frequently asked questions
Which is more powerful, the CaseIH Puma 140 X or the Challenger MT525E?
The CaseIH Puma 140 X and the Challenger MT525E deliver the same power: 140 HP.
Which is more recent, the CaseIH Puma 140 X or the Challenger MT525E?
The CaseIH Puma 140 X is the more recent model: production started in 2018, versus 2015 for the Challenger MT525E.
Which has the higher lift capacity, the CaseIH Puma 140 X or the Challenger MT525E?
The CaseIH Puma 140 X offers a higher rear lift capacity: 6616 kg versus 4037 kg.
Other comparisons
CaseIH Puma 140 X vs Massey Ferguson 6715SCaseIH Puma 140 X vs Massey Ferguson 7140CaseIH Puma 140 X vs Massey Ferguson 7715CaseIH Puma 140 X vs Massey Ferguson 7715SChallenger MT525E vs Massey Ferguson 6615Challenger MT525E vs Massey Ferguson 6715SChallenger MT525E vs Massey Ferguson 7140Challenger MT525E vs Massey Ferguson 7715