CaseIH Puma 140 X vs Volvo 2650
Side-by-side specs comparison
Verdict by the numbers
- The CaseIH Puma 140 X and the Volvo 2650 deliver the same power: 140 HP.
- The CaseIH Puma 140 X is the more recent model: production started in 2018, versus 1979 for the Volvo 2650.
- The CaseIH Puma 140 X offers a higher rear lift capacity: 6616 kg versus 3400 kg.
Full specs comparison
| CaseIH Puma 140 X | Volvo 2650 | |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 140 HP | 140 HP |
| Production years | 2018+ | 1979–1983 |
| Fuel | Diesel | Diesel |
| Cylinders | 6 | 6 |
| Displacement | 6.7 L | 5.5 L |
| Weight | — | 6 599 kg |
| Drive | 4WD | 2WD |
| Transmission | Partial power shift | Power shift |
| Gears (fwd/rev) | 18 / 6 | 14 / 4 |
| Rear lift capacity | 6 616 kg | 3 400 kg |
| Wheelbase | — | 273 cm |
| Length | — | 450 cm |
| Cab | Yes | Yes |
Frequently asked questions
Which is more powerful, the CaseIH Puma 140 X or the Volvo 2650?
The CaseIH Puma 140 X and the Volvo 2650 deliver the same power: 140 HP.
Which is more recent, the CaseIH Puma 140 X or the Volvo 2650?
The CaseIH Puma 140 X is the more recent model: production started in 2018, versus 1979 for the Volvo 2650.
Which has the higher lift capacity, the CaseIH Puma 140 X or the Volvo 2650?
The CaseIH Puma 140 X offers a higher rear lift capacity: 6616 kg versus 3400 kg.

