CaseIH Puma 140 vs John Deere 6140R
Side-by-side specs comparison
Verdict by the numbers
- The CaseIH Puma 140 and the John Deere 6140R deliver the same power: 140 HP.
- The John Deere 6140R is the more recent model: production started in 2013, versus 2008 for the CaseIH Puma 140.
- The John Deere 6140R is heavier: 6615 kg versus 6225 kg for the CaseIH Puma 140.
- The CaseIH Puma 140 offers a higher rear lift capacity: 5527 kg versus 3719 kg.
Full specs comparison
| CaseIH Puma 140 | John Deere 6140R | |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 140 HP | 140 HP |
| Production years | 2008–2011 | 2013–2014 |
| Fuel | Diesel | Diesel |
| Cylinders | 6 | 6 |
| Displacement | 6.7 L | 6.8 L |
| Weight | 6 225 kg | 6 615 kg |
| Drive | 4WD | 2WD or 4WD |
| Transmission | Partial power shift | Power shift |
| Gears (fwd/rev) | 18 / 6 | — |
| Rear lift capacity | 5 527 kg | 3 719 kg |
| Wheelbase | 273 cm | 298 cm |
| Cab | Yes | Yes |
Frequently asked questions
Which is more powerful, the CaseIH Puma 140 or the John Deere 6140R?
The CaseIH Puma 140 and the John Deere 6140R deliver the same power: 140 HP.
Which is more recent, the CaseIH Puma 140 or the John Deere 6140R?
The John Deere 6140R is the more recent model: production started in 2013, versus 2008 for the CaseIH Puma 140.
Which is heavier, the CaseIH Puma 140 or the John Deere 6140R?
The John Deere 6140R is heavier: 6615 kg versus 6225 kg for the CaseIH Puma 140.
Which has the higher lift capacity, the CaseIH Puma 140 or the John Deere 6140R?
The CaseIH Puma 140 offers a higher rear lift capacity: 5527 kg versus 3719 kg.
Other comparisons
CaseIH Farmall 140A vs John Deere 6140RCaseIH Puma 140 vs John Deere 6830CaseIH Puma 140 vs John Deere 6830 PremiumCaseIH Puma 140 vs John Deere 7515CaseIH Puma 140 vs Massey Ferguson 5480Challenger MT525D vs John Deere 6140RJohn Deere 6140R vs Massey Ferguson 5480John Deere 6140R vs Massey Ferguson 6615