CaseIH Puma 140 vs Massey Ferguson 6615
Side-by-side specs comparison
Verdict by the numbers
- The CaseIH Puma 140 and the Massey Ferguson 6615 deliver the same power: 140 HP.
- The Massey Ferguson 6615 is the more recent model: production started in 2014, versus 2008 for the CaseIH Puma 140.
- The CaseIH Puma 140 is heavier: 6225 kg versus 5670 kg for the Massey Ferguson 6615.
- The CaseIH Puma 140 offers a higher rear lift capacity: 5527 kg versus 5171 kg.
Full specs comparison
| CaseIH Puma 140 | Massey Ferguson 6615 | |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 140 HP | 140 HP |
| Production years | 2008–2011 | 2014–2016 |
| Fuel | Diesel | Diesel |
| Cylinders | 6 | 4 |
| Displacement | 6.7 L | 4.9 L |
| Weight | 6 225 kg | 5 670 kg |
| Drive | 4WD | — |
| Transmission | Partial power shift | Power shift |
| Gears (fwd/rev) | 18 / 6 | — |
| Rear lift capacity | 5 527 kg | 5 171 kg |
| Wheelbase | 273 cm | 266 cm |
| Length | — | 469 cm |
| Cab | Yes | Yes |
Frequently asked questions
Which is more powerful, the CaseIH Puma 140 or the Massey Ferguson 6615?
The CaseIH Puma 140 and the Massey Ferguson 6615 deliver the same power: 140 HP.
Which is more recent, the CaseIH Puma 140 or the Massey Ferguson 6615?
The Massey Ferguson 6615 is the more recent model: production started in 2014, versus 2008 for the CaseIH Puma 140.
Which is heavier, the CaseIH Puma 140 or the Massey Ferguson 6615?
The CaseIH Puma 140 is heavier: 6225 kg versus 5670 kg for the Massey Ferguson 6615.
Which has the higher lift capacity, the CaseIH Puma 140 or the Massey Ferguson 6615?
The CaseIH Puma 140 offers a higher rear lift capacity: 5527 kg versus 5171 kg.
Other comparisons
CaseIH Puma 140 vs John Deere 6830CaseIH Puma 140 vs John Deere 6830 PremiumCaseIH Puma 140 vs John Deere 7515CaseIH Puma 140 vs Massey Ferguson 5480Challenger MT525D vs Massey Ferguson 6615Challenger MT525E vs Massey Ferguson 6615John Deere 6140R vs Massey Ferguson 6615Massey Ferguson 6615 vs New Holland T6.175