CaseIH Puma 165 vs Challenger MT545E
Side-by-side specs comparison
Verdict by the numbers
- The CaseIH Puma 165 and the Challenger MT545E deliver the same power: 165 HP.
- The Challenger MT545E is the more recent model: production started in 2015, versus 2014 for the CaseIH Puma 165.
- The Challenger MT545E offers a higher rear lift capacity: 4037 kg versus 3583 kg.
Full specs comparison
| CaseIH Puma 165 | Challenger MT545E | |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 165 HP | 165 HP |
| Production years | 2014+ | 2015–2020 |
| Fuel | Diesel | Diesel |
| Cylinders | 6 | 6 |
| Displacement | 6.7 L | 6.6 L |
| Drive | 4WD | 4WD |
| Transmission | Power shift | Power shift |
| Gears (fwd/rev) | 18 / 6 | — |
| Rear lift capacity | 3 583 kg | 4 037 kg |
| Wheelbase | 273 cm | — |
| Cab | Yes | Yes |
Frequently asked questions
Which is more powerful, the CaseIH Puma 165 or the Challenger MT545E?
The CaseIH Puma 165 and the Challenger MT545E deliver the same power: 165 HP.
Which is more recent, the CaseIH Puma 165 or the Challenger MT545E?
The Challenger MT545E is the more recent model: production started in 2015, versus 2014 for the CaseIH Puma 165.
Which has the higher lift capacity, the CaseIH Puma 165 or the Challenger MT545E?
The Challenger MT545E offers a higher rear lift capacity: 4037 kg versus 3583 kg.
Other comparisons
CaseIH Puma 165 vs Fendt 614 VarioCaseIH Puma 165 vs John Deere 6165JCaseIH Puma 165 vs Landini Landpower 180CaseIH Puma 165 vs Massey Ferguson 7618Challenger MT545E vs Deutz-Fahr 6180 TTVChallenger MT545E vs Massey Ferguson 7718Challenger MT545E vs Massey Ferguson 7718SChallenger MT545E vs New Holland T7.210