CaseIH Puma 225 vs JCB Fastrac 3230
Side-by-side specs comparison
Verdict by the numbers
- The JCB Fastrac 3230 is more powerful than the CaseIH Puma 225: 230 HP versus 225 HP (+5 HP, +2%).
- The CaseIH Puma 225 is the more recent model: production started in 2009, versus 2006 for the JCB Fastrac 3230.
- The JCB Fastrac 3230 is heavier: 7969 kg versus 7484 kg for the CaseIH Puma 225.
- The JCB Fastrac 3230 offers a higher rear lift capacity: 6999 kg versus 5800 kg.
Full specs comparison
| CaseIH Puma 225 | JCB Fastrac 3230 | |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 225 HP | 230 HP |
| Production years | 2009–2010 | 2006–2010 |
| Fuel | Diesel | Diesel |
| Cylinders | 6 | 6 |
| Displacement | 6.7 L | 6.7 L |
| Weight | 7 484 kg | 7 969 kg |
| Drive | 4WD | 4WD |
| Transmission | CVT | Synchronized |
| Gears (fwd/rev) | — | 54 / 18 |
| Rear lift capacity | 5 800 kg | 6 999 kg |
| Wheelbase | 288 cm | 306 cm |
| Length | — | 519 cm |
| Cab | Yes | Yes |
Frequently asked questions
Which is more powerful, the CaseIH Puma 225 or the JCB Fastrac 3230?
The JCB Fastrac 3230 is more powerful than the CaseIH Puma 225: 230 HP versus 225 HP (+5 HP, +2%).
Which is more recent, the CaseIH Puma 225 or the JCB Fastrac 3230?
The CaseIH Puma 225 is the more recent model: production started in 2009, versus 2006 for the JCB Fastrac 3230.
Which is heavier, the CaseIH Puma 225 or the JCB Fastrac 3230?
The JCB Fastrac 3230 is heavier: 7969 kg versus 7484 kg for the CaseIH Puma 225.
Which has the higher lift capacity, the CaseIH Puma 225 or the JCB Fastrac 3230?
The JCB Fastrac 3230 offers a higher rear lift capacity: 6999 kg versus 5800 kg.